5/5/2023 0 Comments He lost to rmn![]() The number of active RMN DNs in early 1919 is 11, all part of Task Force 34 ("eleven of the others were mere dreadnoughts." "she hadn't anticipated that even Janacek would be quite so blatant as to assign every single Manticoran dreadnought still in commission to her.") Of these 77, 75 (63 Medusa-class and 12 Invictus-class) are in commission according to House of Steel and 2 working up ("At the resumption of hostilities, only twelve Invictus-class ships were in commission"). And we have, at the moment, four more of them in various stages of overhaul and working up back home but not assigned to Home Fleet."). We have a fourth squadron assigned to Grendelsbane. We have another squadron of them assigned to Sidemore Station. We have exactly two-count them two-more squadrons of them with Home Fleet. ![]() ("Third Fleet has almost a hundred ships of the wall in its order of battle, including forty-eight of our SD(P)s, Niall, and two SD(P)s are down for local refit. The number of active RMN SD(P)s during Operation Thunderbolt is 77 at most: 48 at Trevor's Star, 12 in Home Fleet, 6 at Marsh, 7 at Grendelsbane and 4 in overhaul and working up at Manticore. The number of active RMN SD(P)s in early 1919 is still 64 ("Now you're reporting that they have a minimum of at least sixty in commission . . . which is only four less than we have.") The number of active RMN SD(P)s in 1918 is 64 ("sixty-four of the new superdreadnoughts are more than sufficient") Let us estimate the number of active RMN DNs, SDs and SD(P)s between 1918 and Operation Thunderbolt. Re: RMN SD numbers (built, sold and lost in Thunderbolt)Ī) The inconsistency between RMN SD and SD(P) losses during Operation Thunderbolt and the SDs in active fleet available to be destroyed in the 27 Havenite occupied systems and at Grendelsbane.Įlizabeth says 61 SDs and SD(P)s)have been destroyed by RHN during Operation Thunderbolt ("Basically, we've lost (.) sixty-one superdreadnoughts.") We know 7 SD(P)s were destroyed at Grendelsbane, so the rest of 54 were presumably pre-pod SDs. the number of RMN SDs and SD(P)s lost during Operation Thunderbolt (61, of which 7 SD(P)s and 54 SDs) is much too high (probably by 30-40) the number of RMN pre-pod wallers (Bellerophon-class DNs and especially Sphynx-class SDs) built during the war (1905-1913) is much too low (probably by 60-100) There are five inconsistencies and they concern: My questions and comments will be about two sets ship numbers that seem to be somewhat at odds between themselves and with other data. ![]() They seem important and I posted hoping to get a clearer picture, not just to point them out. I like math and I tried to estimate the variation of RMN strength in time when I ran into some inconsistencies. I like that the books are pretty consistent internally. I will divide it in several posts for easier reading and replies. I also apologize for the great length of the topic. However, if this topic was previously discussed or if I should have posted it elsewere, I apologize to the moderator and ask him to advise me where to discuss it. Then I would like to say that I searched the forum for a discussion on this topic and I did not find any. I will start by saying that I am a fan of David Weber and that English is not my native language.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |